In July this year, Mr. Xu sued the court. The two companies each argued that the opening of wood companies, resulting in many reasons for cracking the floor, rather than the quality of the product, so do not agree with Mr. Xu's claim. Decoration company argued that the contract with Mr. Xu agreed, such as Mr. Xu procurement of material quality problems caused by the loss, the responsibility borne by Mr. Xu himself.The floor of the bad situation is a problem with the quality of the floor, and decoration has nothing to do, so do not agree with Mr. Xu's claim. The burden of proof of the burden of the manufacturer of the court that Mr. Xu floor of the home adverse conditions due to the burden of proof in the Wood Company, the company can not prove the current wood, the court confirmed that there is a problem of product quality, wood companies should bear the burden of return and burden The resulting costs.
Mr. Xu proposed replacement of the floor and will inevitably have rental costs, the venue fee of 1,000 yuan, the cost is reasonable, to be supported. The parties to confirm the replacement of the floor together the necessary materials, labor costs 4,000 yuan, the court shall be sighted. Accordingly, the Court made the above judgment. Mr. Xu believes that the quality of the floor is unqualified, but does not rule out the possibility of improper laying. Wood companies believe that the laying of the floor is inappropriate. Decorating company is considered to be unqualified floor quality.
Related links:
fixing method of wpc flooringindustrial wall panel
patio PVC fence
