Verdict in Jackson Trial

~ ßã£îçh ~ said:

but shukar talain unhon nay yah nahin taha tay
Al-Qaeda ti sazish thi yah bi

lolzzz

~ ßã£îçh ~ said:

but shukar talain unhon nay yah nahin taha tay
Al-Qaeda ti sazish thi yah bi

lolzzz

kash_beauty said:

yes!!its true

he got away wid it


bt mayb..he wasnt guilty

Asian said:

the prosecutions evidance was circumstans. the main witness was not consistant.

they used a Jury trial as "to show that the common lay man has the Law as his own".

Ask your self one Question. as Females if your child (Allah forbid) was assualted in such a way? then would you press for liabel and slander? e.g. Money as Gavin's mother was after


or for a Criminal conviction?

in this respect i would say that the MJ trial is exceptable and perfectly good Law. snedons defece was Puthetic even for a civil advocate (got to be said)

but i agree with the verdict because reguadless of how strange he is, he is NOT a child molesterer. i think it was people using him for money pure and simple

Jia_ka_chand said:

Asian said:

the prosecutions evidance was circumstans. the main witness was not consistant.

they used a Jury trial as "to show that the common lay man has the Law as his own".

Ask your self one Question. as Females if your child (Allah forbid) was assualted in such a way? then would you press for liabel and slander? e.g. Money as Gavin's mother was after



see being a Law student works

but i think yes it was simply a money grabbing scandle just like Jordan chandller, another Golddigger

and besides i like his songs
or for a Criminal conviction?

in this respect i would say that the MJ trial is exceptable and perfectly good Law. snedons defece was Puthetic even for a civil advocate (got to be said)

but i agree with the verdict because reguadless of how strange he is, he is NOT a child molesterer. i think it was people using him for money pure and simple

Very Very Very well said Asian. I have exactly the same standpoints.

He owns the Beatles Album, each time anyone uses their music he gets paid for it, people were saying on MJ's website that Sony might have a conspiracy to make him sell it - I don't know about that one though.

But yeah in short - he is more innocent than guilty and I can't wait for him to make a grand comeback - and write a book about this whole event - which I would def buy!

kash_beauty said:

chand!

tht time i was shocked!
so i typed whteva came in my mind

i agree wid mani!..its a publicity stunt for the boyz family n MJ as well

mallak!! said:

they boy is 15....if mj aws accused..that meant he was abused....and now that mj is not guilty....boy gets no dosh but hes told the world he aws assaulted....his life is over...how cna a mother do this to her kid..how?

andddddddd yes i do think as well it was all done to get mj to seel his back catalogue which he was about to actually..or so i read...he might evcen do that now cuz o his humongous debts