Landing on Moon...really ??

872 views 13 replies
Reply to Topic
new_beau

Age: 124
Total Posts: 10168
Points: 0

Location:
United Arab Emirates, United Arab Emirates

There are lot of controversies that Armstrong never landed on moon,
They say that It was all a fake story played by nasa.

A guy called as collier was about to leave for moon from Russia,
And these Americans want to take the pride from the Russians that they where the first one to land on moon,
But they really didn't.

THE PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE

ISSUE 1:




Since the Moon has only one light source, the Sun, the shadows must be in line. But in this cases, it looks as if there are multiple light sources in moon, which is not possible.


Issue 2:





The foreground of many images of the astronauts on the Moon are filled in with light, while the shadows remain absolutely black, again proving that there are multiple light sources.


Issue 3 :





There are no stars in the background from pictures taken on the Moon.

Issue 4 :







In some images, a huge light source can be seen reflected in the astronaut's visors. This has to be a very bright, nearby source. There is no possibility of external light source in moon.

ISSUE 5 - How could NASA take TV images of the LM ascending on Apollo 15, 16, and 17 if there was no one on the Lunar surface to man the camera?





ISSUE 6:

There can't be any pictures taken on the Moon because the film would melt in the 250° temperatures. Any film exposed to 250° would indeed melt at that temperature.

Issue-7:

The LM engine was very powerful. How come it did not leave a crater below the spacecraft? Why didn't it kick up any dust when it landed?





Issue 8:

The footprints left by the astronauts are proof that the Moon landings are fake.

This one is also essentially a two pronged argument. First, the Fox show charged that the LM engine was so powerful that the upper layer of dust should have been blown away around the LM, so there should not be any footprints. Others have charged that the footprints should not be there since in the absence of water as a bonding agent, they should not maintain coherent shapes and sharp outlines





Issue 9:

There is no dust on LM footpads. -- According to Kaysing and Fox, this is the strongest evidence that the Moon landings are faked. They allege that with the swirling dust from LM descent engine, the foot pads should be covered with dust.





issue 11 :

The pictures below show that flags are waving. And they never will. The flag was on the airless Moon, just as we all knew.







SO IT MEANS THAT NEIL ARMSTRONG WAS NOT THE FIRST PERSON TO LAND ON MOON
Posted 23 Aug 2006

~Fragi~ says
hmm intresting thz for sharing
Posted 23 Aug 2006

~Fragi~ says
Several motives have been suggested for the U.S. government to fake the moon landings - some of the recurrent elements are:
Distraction - The U.S. government benefited from a popular distraction to take attention away from the Vietnam war. Lunar activities did abruptly stop, with planned missions cancelled, around the same time that the US ceased its involvement in the Vietnam War.
Cold War Prestige - The U.S. government considered it vital that the U.S. win the space race with the USSR. Going to the Moon, if it was possible, would have been risky and expensive. It would have been much easier to fake the landing, thereby ensuring success.
Money - NASA raised approximately 30 billion dollars pretending to go to the moon. This could have been used to pay off a large number of people, providing significant motivation for complicity. In variations of this theory, the space industry is characterized as a political economy, much like the military industrial complex, creating fertile ground for its own survival.
Risk - The available technology at the time was such that there was a good chance that the landing might fail if genuinely attempted.
The Soviets, with their own competing moon program and an intense economic and political and military rivalry with the USA, could be expected to have cried foul if the USA tried to fake a Moon landing. Theorist Ralph Rene responds that shortly after the alleged Moon landings, the USA silently started shipping hundreds of thousands of tons of grain as humanitarian aid to the allegedly starving USSR. He views this as evidence of a cover-up, the grain being the price of silence. (The Soviet Union in fact had its own Moon program).

Proponents of the Apollo hoax suggest that the Soviet Union, and latterly Russia, and the United States were allied in the exploration of space, during the Cold war and after. The United States and the former Soviet Union today routinely engage in cooperative space ventures, as do many other nations that are popularly believed to be enemies. However, this suggestion is challenged by the impression of intense international competition that was under way during the Cold War and is not supported by the accounts of participants on either side of the Iron Curtain. Many argue that the fact that the Soviet Union and other Communist bloc countries, eager to discredit the United States, have not produced any contrary evidence to be the single most significant argument against such a hoax. Soviet involvement might also implausibly multiply the scale of the conspiracy, to include hundreds of thousands of conspirators of uncertain loyalty. http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Apollo_moon_landing_hoa x_accusations
Posted 23 Aug 2006

javad says
nice
Posted 23 Aug 2006

chandbabu says
v nice
Posted 23 Aug 2006

BadShaH1 says
yes i saw the documentry
very controversial issue.
Posted 23 Aug 2006

cutefriend says
jee jee dekha hia aik aadh bar per TV per


udher bhi yehi baat chal rahi thi

ab sahi kiya hai dont know
Posted 24 Aug 2006

chandbabu says
may b
Posted 24 Aug 2006

new_beau says
Thanks FRAGI for additions
Posted 29 Aug 2006

~Fragi~ says
u r welkum
Posted 29 Aug 2006

BadShaH1 says
america's pride goin down..
Posted 06 Nov 2006

valandrian says
bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653
bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653
bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653
bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653
bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653
bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653
bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653
bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653
bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653
bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653
bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653bd17653
bd17653
Posted 19 Apr 2018

Posted 21 Sep 2018

Posted 31 Oct 2018

Reply to Topic