umair16 said:2003 was not a bad year for lollywood . . come on people . .i understand their was no super super hit but atleast the tenology has omproved and location and now directors are trying to make good movies
I dont think this was a bad year for lollywood its just the starting of a better lollywood it takes time . .
SRK_FANATIC said:locations n cameras are as important as the good directors n scripts, u can't have a good director working on a strong script with 100 years old camera by somewhere in lahore...wat u been hittin man
Exclent news YDAKH !!!
How many screens in the cinema ?
And do they all have DD , and DTS sound system .
Joan_of_Arc said:Hi,
well its good 2 have healthy discussion. But after reading the content of this topic, what I personally feel is that u guys have lotssss of free time.
HOW ??? ok ok ... i know none of my business.
What I wanted to put across is when same director came up with "refugee" , that point of time there was no hue and cry. So why now ??
Best solution is
pls stop watching bollywood movies. I dont think any of the indian producer will go bankrupt if u guys will not watch indian movies.
And if u ppl cant control (bcoz they r good) then
atleast dont crib. It sounds weird on ur part. So from today on if u r watching indian movies, watch it at ur own risk . Please do not expect 2 much from Indians.