Logo

Verdict in Jackson Trial

Jurors acquited him of ALL molestation charges
whatt??
i can't believe it.

Posted on 6/14/2005 2:21:45 AM

whttttttttttttttttttttttttttt

i dnt belve thssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

Posted on 6/14/2005 2:22:47 AM

man..i need to go n chk geo news


Posted on 6/14/2005 2:23:18 AM

ME EITHERRRRRRRRRRRR

i'm trying to call everyone and their phones are all busy
... :S

Posted on 6/14/2005 2:23:32 AM

alright must get back to 'work'

Posted on 6/14/2005 2:26:19 AM

LOCK UP ALL THE KIDZ

PATHETIC....ABSOLUTELY PATHETIC

Posted on 6/14/2005 2:28:29 AM

yeah
I just posted similar topic in foreignwood
I was shocked too they found him not guilty

Posted on 6/14/2005 2:36:25 AM

yes!!its true

he got away wid it


bt mayb..he wasnt guilty

Posted on 6/14/2005 2:37:04 AM

God Knows

Posted on 6/14/2005 2:38:39 AM


Posted on 6/14/2005 2:38:54 AM

YEAH...IT;S STRANGE HOW HE WAS FOUND NOT GUILTY ON ALL ACCOUNTS

Posted on 6/14/2005 2:39:27 AM

but shukar talain unhon nay yah nahin taha tay
Al-Qaeda ti sazish thi yah bi

lolzzz


Posted on 6/14/2005 2:40:31 AM

thts coz he was innocent
not enuf evidence


so sweet sohni

Posted on 6/14/2005 2:40:39 AM

oopch

Posted on 6/14/2005 2:40:54 AM

~ ßã£îçh ~:
but shukar talain unhon nay yah nahin taha tay
Al-Qaeda ti sazish thi yah bi

lolzzz



yeh bhi hai


Posted on 6/14/2005 2:42:59 AM

~ ßã£îçh ~:
but shukar talain unhon nay yah nahin taha tay
Al-Qaeda ti sazish thi yah bi

lolzzz



LOLZ TEEK KAHA....BUT MAYBE WE SPOKE 2 SOOOON ABHI WAQT HE YEH KEHNE KO


KASHHH

Posted on 6/14/2005 2:45:03 AM

he was innocent

Posted on 6/14/2005 2:50:13 AM

THEY WERE BRIBED

Posted on 6/14/2005 2:59:57 AM

the prosecutions evidance was circumstans. the main witness was not consistant.

they used a Jury trial as "to show that the common lay man has the Law as his own".

Ask your self one Question. as Females if your child (Allah forbid) was assualted in such a way? then would you press for liabel and slander? e.g. Money as Gavin's mother was after


or for a Criminal conviction?

in this respect i would say that the MJ trial is exceptable and perfectly good Law. snedons defece was Puthetic even for a civil advocate (got to be said)

but i agree with the verdict because reguadless of how strange he is, he is NOT a child molesterer. i think it was people using him for money pure and simple

Posted on 6/14/2005 5:35:25 PM

publicity stunt....never thot for a minute he was guilty....people need micheal jacksons to keep themselves bus ynow the magic oreality tv iswearing off..simple..fair decision...they shud do da gavin guy over

Posted on 6/14/2005 7:22:02 PM

kash_beauty:
yes!!its true

he got away wid it


bt mayb..he wasnt guilty


that's the responce some people are giving "he got away with it..."

I've always believed he was innocent

Posted on 6/14/2005 9:02:45 PM

Asian:
the prosecutions evidance was circumstans. the main witness was not consistant.

they used a Jury trial as "to show that the common lay man has the Law as his own".

Ask your self one Question. as Females if your child (Allah forbid) was assualted in such a way? then would you press for liabel and slander? e.g. Money as Gavin's mother was after


or for a Criminal conviction?

in this respect i would say that the MJ trial is exceptable and perfectly good Law. snedons defece was Puthetic even for a civil advocate (got to be said)

but i agree with the verdict because reguadless of how strange he is, he is NOT a child molesterer. i think it was people using him for money pure and simple


Very Very Very well said Asian. I have exactly the same standpoints.

He owns the Beatles Album, each time anyone uses their music he gets paid for it, people were saying on MJ's website that Sony might have a conspiracy to make him sell it - I don't know about that one though.

But yeah in short - he is more innocent than guilty and I can't wait for him to make a grand comeback - and write a book about this whole event - which I would def buy!

Posted on 6/14/2005 11:03:33 PM

chand!

tht time i was shocked!
so i typed whteva came in my mind

i agree wid mani!..its a publicity stunt for the boyz family n MJ as well

Posted on 6/15/2005 4:21:54 PM

Jia_ka_chand:
Asian:
the prosecutions evidance was circumstans. the main witness was not consistant.

they used a Jury trial as "to show that the common lay man has the Law as his own".

Ask your self one Question. as Females if your child (Allah forbid) was assualted in such a way? then would you press for liabel and slander? e.g. Money as Gavin's mother was after



see being a Law student works

but i think yes it was simply a money grabbing scandle just like Jordan chandller, another Golddigger

and besides i like his songs
or for a Criminal conviction?

in this respect i would say that the MJ trial is exceptable and perfectly good Law. snedons defece was Puthetic even for a civil advocate (got to be said)

but i agree with the verdict because reguadless of how strange he is, he is NOT a child molesterer. i think it was people using him for money pure and simple


Very Very Very well said Asian. I have exactly the same standpoints.

He owns the Beatles Album, each time anyone uses their music he gets paid for it, people were saying on MJ's website that Sony might have a conspiracy to make him sell it - I don't know about that one though.

But yeah in short - he is more innocent than guilty and I can't wait for him to make a grand comeback - and write a book about this whole event - which I would def buy!

Posted on 6/15/2005 5:24:07 PM

kash_beauty:
chand!

tht time i was shocked!
so i typed whteva came in my mind

i agree wid mani!..its a publicity stunt for the boyz family n MJ as well


You're a smart girl Kash and you gave a smart reaction! Those boys and Janet Arvezo are going to face a lot of disgrace!

Posted on 6/16/2005 1:09:54 PM

they boy is 15....if mj aws accused..that meant he was abused....and now that mj is not guilty....boy gets no dosh but hes told the world he aws assaulted....his life is over...how cna a mother do this to her kid..how?

andddddddd yes i do think as well it was all done to get mj to seel his back catalogue which he was about to actually..or so i read...he might evcen do that now cuz o his humongous debts

Posted on 6/16/2005 1:29:36 PM

mallak!!:
they boy is 15....if mj aws accused..that meant he was abused....and now that mj is not guilty....boy gets no dosh but hes told the world he aws assaulted....his life is over...how cna a mother do this to her kid..how?

andddddddd yes i do think as well it was all done to get mj to seel his back catalogue which he was about to actually..or so i read...he might evcen do that now cuz o his humongous debts




well 12 Lay members of the Public find him NOT GULITY in a court of Law, i would rarther respect 12 Lay memebrs being convinced by a Defence then one Judge. Gavin's family background spoke for its self.


like it or lump it we live in a Democracy

Posted on 6/16/2005 3:05:52 PM

question is....wud u be saying the same like two weeeks ago wen ppl awnted to rip mj's throat out?

its all media manipulation....and people did get manipulated....smart pr and all.....who wudnt buy da new mj album now?


btw i alawys blv'd him to be innocent....even if he was convicted...the guy is twisted.......anyone wid so much dosh at such yung age wud be...hence he is a victim of the society...

Posted on 6/18/2005 5:48:03 PM

yes i would and I DID,


yes the Media can manipulate people thats why the Juriors were Carefully selected. NEVER before has Jury members actually been means tested, so in a way your remark is insulting their intelegance. they were given the so called proof. and the relevent Statute (Act of congress or the whatever the Amercian people have)


ok let me put it this way. Would you rarther be tryed by a high court judge who day in and day out has heard the same defence over and over again then to assume that they have fixed prejudices. OR


would you be tryed infront of Lay Members of the public, 12 people are harder to convince then one......

Posted on 6/20/2005 6:39:49 PM