Logo

laaj..

yo peepz...i still have a question..does laaj have the same quality pics like yeh dil aap ka huwa? and what about the music? if its has the same quality then i am looking forward to watch it, if not then forget it!coz i saw on prime tv, the picture of laaj is very bad!

Posted on 10/24/2003 12:08:56 PM

i dont think it has the same quality . . i saw some songs and the quality was not all that . but it is based in the past

Posted on 10/24/2003 3:10:39 PM

well i dont think u should use bad quality if u want to make a movie based in the past..for example lagaan was also based in the past but they used high quality..so i think we should always uses high quality equipment..

Posted on 10/24/2003 4:22:46 PM

100% with u on that one

Posted on 10/24/2003 6:00:14 PM

well paki lion u have to watch the movie first in the theater then give any comment on it. u ve raised the question abt picture and sound quality of the movie let me tell u that laaj has got excellent picture quality and excellent digital sound even better sound recording than yeh dil aapka huwa cuz i have seen the movie twice in the theater ull definitely love the action and fight sequences in the movie and for ur information the movie will release over sease in january or februry so keep ur fingers across it.

Posted on 10/24/2003 6:38:42 PM

europe me bhi ?

Posted on 10/24/2003 6:58:13 PM

yea i think soo

Posted on 10/25/2003 5:45:14 PM

mr nice guy:
europe me bhi ?




hey , thats outlandish in yur sig isnt it ....?

Posted on 10/26/2003 1:21:03 AM

ya

Posted on 10/26/2003 7:07:18 PM

Laaj is a great movie yaar paki lion..video quality is normal..because this film is not based on good location but story and direction,u all people will surpize 'Laaj' action which r different..and this movie will release uk and abroad in english language,so chkitout..

Posted on 10/26/2003 11:51:15 PM

well sorry to say it..i dont watch movie wich has normal or bad quality..i want high quality like larki punjaban and yeh dil aapka huwa..

Posted on 10/27/2003 5:05:14 PM